<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Cher Phillips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cherphillips.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Views on online media and journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 22:25:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Guitar Hero just makes me mad by Mindy McAdams</title>
		<link>http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/guitar-hero-just-makes-me-mad/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindy McAdams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 22:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/?p=78#comment-43</guid>
		<description>&quot;The methods we used in this class took so long to create so little that I simply can not see print journalists adapting these practices.&quot;

Fair enough ... but if they are required to shoot video, then how should they shoot instead? If we expect people to watch reporter-shot video online, doesn&#039;t the video have to be interesting and good? 

As for your feeling like an MMC 2100 student thrust into a capstone course, I&#039;m very sorry about that! I hope we can talk some more about how I could improve the video instruction.

As for the IML, I really do suggest that you write an e-mail to our dean, Dr. Wright, and our graduate dean, Dr. Treise. Don&#039;t do it just to complain but rather to explain what you believe a grad student such as yourself ought to have access to in our college. A lot of changes are under way here now and your input would really be valuable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The methods we used in this class took so long to create so little that I simply can not see print journalists adapting these practices.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fair enough &#8230; but if they are required to shoot video, then how should they shoot instead? If we expect people to watch reporter-shot video online, doesn&#8217;t the video have to be interesting and good? </p>
<p>As for your feeling like an MMC 2100 student thrust into a capstone course, I&#8217;m very sorry about that! I hope we can talk some more about how I could improve the video instruction.</p>
<p>As for the IML, I really do suggest that you write an e-mail to our dean, Dr. Wright, and our graduate dean, Dr. Treise. Don&#8217;t do it just to complain but rather to explain what you believe a grad student such as yourself ought to have access to in our college. A lot of changes are under way here now and your input would really be valuable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lebrew Jones &#8211; great package, yet reaching by philicher</title>
		<link>http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/lebrew-jones-great-package-yet-reaching/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>philicher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/?p=76#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Hahahahahahahahahahaha. 

*This*  is why I dropped my other blog.   

Even in an academic discussion, to assume someone is a &quot;VILLIAN&quot; in a feature story would not be very objective, now would it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahahahahahahahahahaha. </p>
<p>*This*  is why I dropped my other blog.   </p>
<p>Even in an academic discussion, to assume someone is a &#8220;VILLIAN&#8221; in a feature story would not be very objective, now would it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lebrew Jones &#8211; great package, yet reaching by ccsnyder</title>
		<link>http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/lebrew-jones-great-package-yet-reaching/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>ccsnyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 06:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/?p=76#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Cher, you say, &quot;ugh...I never said she&#039;s questioning his innocence&quot;
So then who wrote this (awkward and incomplete) first sentence of your blog? 
&quot;About halfway through the online package on Lebrew Jones and the Death of Micki Hall when it became clear why the reporter was questioning Lebrew Jones innocence.&quot; 

Also, I think you mean VILLAIN, not protagonist.  See definitions below:


vil·lain      /ˈvɪlən/ –noun 1. a cruelly malicious person who is involved in or devoted to wickedness or crime; scoundrel.  
2. a character in a play, novel, or the like, who constitutes an important evil agency in the plot 

pro·tag·o·nist      /proʊˈtægənɪst/ –noun 1. the leading character, hero, or heroine of a drama or other literary work.  
2. a proponent for or advocate of a political cause, social program, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cher, you say, &#8220;ugh&#8230;I never said she&#8217;s questioning his innocence&#8221;<br />
So then who wrote this (awkward and incomplete) first sentence of your blog?<br />
&#8220;About halfway through the online package on Lebrew Jones and the Death of Micki Hall when it became clear why the reporter was questioning Lebrew Jones innocence.&#8221; </p>
<p>Also, I think you mean VILLAIN, not protagonist.  See definitions below:</p>
<p>vil·lain      /ˈvɪlən/ –noun 1. a cruelly malicious person who is involved in or devoted to wickedness or crime; scoundrel.<br />
2. a character in a play, novel, or the like, who constitutes an important evil agency in the plot </p>
<p>pro·tag·o·nist      /proʊˈtægənɪst/ –noun 1. the leading character, hero, or heroine of a drama or other literary work.<br />
2. a proponent for or advocate of a political cause, social program, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lebrew Jones &#8211; great package, yet reaching by philicher</title>
		<link>http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/lebrew-jones-great-package-yet-reaching/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>philicher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/?p=76#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Ugh....  I never said she was questioning his innocence.
  
Rather, I think she was perhaps too personally invested in finding him not guilty.   You can hear that in her question to the sister during an interview, when the sister provides info that can only be seen as heresay and can never be supported and documented.   Does the source provide what the reporter so desperately wants in order to please her?  It begs that question.  


The method of story telling begs a protagonist.  It NEEDS a bad guy in the narrative to make it entertaining.   It did implicate the van driver in very subtle ways, the pimp in more obvious ways.

Jones IQ speaks to his capacity and vulnerability of  used by detectives as a fall guy for the murder.   Here is a man who is developmentally disabled -- if his IQ is that low.   Why gloss over that point when it goes miles in explaining how this could happen and how he could be convinced to give a false confession-- telling the story about the girl killing herself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh&#8230;.  I never said she was questioning his innocence.</p>
<p>Rather, I think she was perhaps too personally invested in finding him not guilty.   You can hear that in her question to the sister during an interview, when the sister provides info that can only be seen as heresay and can never be supported and documented.   Does the source provide what the reporter so desperately wants in order to please her?  It begs that question.  </p>
<p>The method of story telling begs a protagonist.  It NEEDS a bad guy in the narrative to make it entertaining.   It did implicate the van driver in very subtle ways, the pimp in more obvious ways.</p>
<p>Jones IQ speaks to his capacity and vulnerability of  used by detectives as a fall guy for the murder.   Here is a man who is developmentally disabled &#8212; if his IQ is that low.   Why gloss over that point when it goes miles in explaining how this could happen and how he could be convinced to give a false confession&#8211; telling the story about the girl killing herself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lebrew Jones &#8211; great package, yet reaching by lindablasi</title>
		<link>http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/lebrew-jones-great-package-yet-reaching/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>lindablasi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/?p=76#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the reporter was questioning Jones&#039; innocence; it seemed me she was questioning his guilt.  I also don&#039;t know what you said it &quot;begs a protagonist.&quot;  The protagonists are Lebrew Jones and the girl&#039;s mother.  I didn&#039;t see  how it implicated the van driver, to me it implicated the pimp.  And how should the reporter have &quot;given more strength&quot; to Jones&#039; IQ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the reporter was questioning Jones&#8217; innocence; it seemed me she was questioning his guilt.  I also don&#8217;t know what you said it &#8220;begs a protagonist.&#8221;  The protagonists are Lebrew Jones and the girl&#8217;s mother.  I didn&#8217;t see  how it implicated the van driver, to me it implicated the pimp.  And how should the reporter have &#8220;given more strength&#8221; to Jones&#8217; IQ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blogging 1 &#8211; Video comparison by keciaj</title>
		<link>http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/blogging-1-video-comparison/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>keciaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/?p=74#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I agree with Cher&#039;s comments about A View From the Pulpit concerning how Ben de la Cruz focused more on the views and feelings of the people than the candidates in this story.  And it was a story.  I liked the video particularly because in editing the videographer was very organized and captured all angles that the African American community is viewing this campaign.  Although he interviewed a number of people, it was very conversational and it didn&#039;t feel like you were just listening to a bunch of quotes.  And from this organization I could see how many of the women were more concerned with gender and race issues where the male leaders were focusing on choosing a candidate who would ultimately effect change and improvement for the race.

I thought it was clever to split the screen for example while interviewing one religious leader, the other side of the screen would have a picture of Obama or Hillary or President Clinton depending on what the person was talking about.  I think the shots of the people in the church and the emotional clips the videographer chose also kept my interest in this video which was 5 minutes long.  Ultimately I think the video was very stylish and polished and newsworthy because these black religious leaders do influence how their congregations view candidates and vote.

I understand what Cher meant when she said A Day at the Beach with GOP voters didn&#039;t really have an arc.  I liked the video because it was showing the issues people thought about and unlike the first video, these people weren&#039;t leaders or talking about how they made their decisions based on church.  I think this video had a more light-hearted feel which was also nice.  I think the shots of the surroundings at the beach were very appropriate because it supported the tone and body language of the people being interviewed.  You will talk and behave differently if you&#039;re at the beach than if you were dressed up at church.   But I can see how Cher would say it made Republicans seem less serious than the black leaders in the other video.  So I appreciated the shots of the children on rides or the jerseys on the wall of the restaurant.  

I also thought the videographer did a nice job of being selective with what parts of the interview he included.  The people he talked to expressed themselves well and told why they were supporting one candidate or in some cases undecided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Cher&#8217;s comments about A View From the Pulpit concerning how Ben de la Cruz focused more on the views and feelings of the people than the candidates in this story.  And it was a story.  I liked the video particularly because in editing the videographer was very organized and captured all angles that the African American community is viewing this campaign.  Although he interviewed a number of people, it was very conversational and it didn&#8217;t feel like you were just listening to a bunch of quotes.  And from this organization I could see how many of the women were more concerned with gender and race issues where the male leaders were focusing on choosing a candidate who would ultimately effect change and improvement for the race.</p>
<p>I thought it was clever to split the screen for example while interviewing one religious leader, the other side of the screen would have a picture of Obama or Hillary or President Clinton depending on what the person was talking about.  I think the shots of the people in the church and the emotional clips the videographer chose also kept my interest in this video which was 5 minutes long.  Ultimately I think the video was very stylish and polished and newsworthy because these black religious leaders do influence how their congregations view candidates and vote.</p>
<p>I understand what Cher meant when she said A Day at the Beach with GOP voters didn&#8217;t really have an arc.  I liked the video because it was showing the issues people thought about and unlike the first video, these people weren&#8217;t leaders or talking about how they made their decisions based on church.  I think this video had a more light-hearted feel which was also nice.  I think the shots of the surroundings at the beach were very appropriate because it supported the tone and body language of the people being interviewed.  You will talk and behave differently if you&#8217;re at the beach than if you were dressed up at church.   But I can see how Cher would say it made Republicans seem less serious than the black leaders in the other video.  So I appreciated the shots of the children on rides or the jerseys on the wall of the restaurant.  </p>
<p>I also thought the videographer did a nice job of being selective with what parts of the interview he included.  The people he talked to expressed themselves well and told why they were supporting one candidate or in some cases undecided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A little devil&#8217;s advocacy about repurposing by Mindy McAdams</title>
		<link>http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/a-little-devils-advocacy-about-repurposing/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindy McAdams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/a-little-devils-advocacy-about-repurposing/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Nice post. I agree with much of what you wrote, although I&#039;m a big fan of data chunks too.

Too many long-form stories are just too boring.

A great long-form story is a wonderful thing, but there aren&#039;t so many of those, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. I agree with much of what you wrote, although I&#8217;m a big fan of data chunks too.</p>
<p>Too many long-form stories are just too boring.</p>
<p>A great long-form story is a wonderful thing, but there aren&#8217;t so many of those, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Soundslides 3 by Sanam</title>
		<link>http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/2007/11/29/soundslides-3/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/2007/11/29/soundslides-3/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Wow, it must have been tough to work on this story. What was the reason for the city council&#039;s resistance ? 

You can put a password for this post. In the editing mode of this post, you will see the password option on the right side of the page, under &quot;categories&quot; and &quot;discussion&quot; sections. It&#039;s called &quot;Post  Password.&quot; You can then ask Mindy to email the class the password. 

Take care!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it must have been tough to work on this story. What was the reason for the city council&#8217;s resistance ? </p>
<p>You can put a password for this post. In the editing mode of this post, you will see the password option on the right side of the page, under &#8220;categories&#8221; and &#8220;discussion&#8221; sections. It&#8217;s called &#8220;Post  Password.&#8221; You can then ask Mindy to email the class the password. </p>
<p>Take care!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kobre C &amp; D &#8212; tagged to remember by Mindy McAdams</title>
		<link>http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/kobre-c-d-tagged-to-remember/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindy McAdams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/kobre-c-d-tagged-to-remember/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Ha! Somehow I missed reading this post until now! I love this:  &quot;if a journalist is going to fill so many roles as a platypus does, it sure would be nice to have a pouch to carry around all this crap in.&quot; Good observation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! Somehow I missed reading this post until now! I love this:  &#8220;if a journalist is going to fill so many roles as a platypus does, it sure would be nice to have a pouch to carry around all this crap in.&#8221; Good observation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Soundslide Critiques by Curt Franklin</title>
		<link>http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/soundslide-critiques/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cherphillips.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/soundslide-critiques/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with your initial point -- this was a &quot;vignette&quot; or &quot;snapshot&quot;, but there wasn&#039;t a story with any of the traditional structures there. I struggled with that -- there were additional things that kept coming up as I worked on the project (Ian&#039;s involvement with the mountain biking team, for example), but I ultimately felt that they were additional projects rather than expansions of this project.
As I look back at this project, I can think of several other facets to add -- more voices, moving away from the repair facility to the racing team (and other cycling teams), talking with faculty members who cycle, talking to the UPD officers who collect abandoned bikes at the end of the term -- but I didn&#039;t pursue them for this project and it probably would have benefited from including at least one of the ideas.
Cher mentions the ending, and I was pleased with the way Ian expressed his relationship with cycling. I worried just a bit about the last photo because I absolutely fell in love with that shot. Whenever I go head over heels for an element of a project, whether it&#039;s a photo, a lede, or an illustration, I begin to worry that I&#039;m keeping it in because I like it, rather than because it serves the story. I&#039;m really glad this one worked out.
I&#039;ve also got to comment on the sound. Recording the interview turned out to be a colossal chore for this project. The first recording session was during a driving rain storm. The recording was clear, but you clearly heard the hammering of raindrops on the roof of the shed where we were taking shelter. Ian and I missed several opportunities to grab a make-up recording, and finally connected on Monday night before the project deadline. He was in Gainesville and I was in New York, working on assignment at the Jacob Javits Center. I found a partially-completed press room at the convention center and put a Voice-over-IP phone on a table. I called Ian, clicked on the speaker-phone, and held my recorder next to the speaker.
I record phone interviews all the time for work, but have resisted using a VoIP phone because I don&#039;t like the sound quality. I&#039;m not thrilled with this recording, but it&#039;s a vast improvement over the first take, and I&#039;m very gratified that Cher and Inigo both enjoyed the quality. I suppose it&#039;s a great reminder that we&#039;re not always the best judge of our own work...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with your initial point &#8212; this was a &#8220;vignette&#8221; or &#8220;snapshot&#8221;, but there wasn&#8217;t a story with any of the traditional structures there. I struggled with that &#8212; there were additional things that kept coming up as I worked on the project (Ian&#8217;s involvement with the mountain biking team, for example), but I ultimately felt that they were additional projects rather than expansions of this project.<br />
As I look back at this project, I can think of several other facets to add &#8212; more voices, moving away from the repair facility to the racing team (and other cycling teams), talking with faculty members who cycle, talking to the UPD officers who collect abandoned bikes at the end of the term &#8212; but I didn&#8217;t pursue them for this project and it probably would have benefited from including at least one of the ideas.<br />
Cher mentions the ending, and I was pleased with the way Ian expressed his relationship with cycling. I worried just a bit about the last photo because I absolutely fell in love with that shot. Whenever I go head over heels for an element of a project, whether it&#8217;s a photo, a lede, or an illustration, I begin to worry that I&#8217;m keeping it in because I like it, rather than because it serves the story. I&#8217;m really glad this one worked out.<br />
I&#8217;ve also got to comment on the sound. Recording the interview turned out to be a colossal chore for this project. The first recording session was during a driving rain storm. The recording was clear, but you clearly heard the hammering of raindrops on the roof of the shed where we were taking shelter. Ian and I missed several opportunities to grab a make-up recording, and finally connected on Monday night before the project deadline. He was in Gainesville and I was in New York, working on assignment at the Jacob Javits Center. I found a partially-completed press room at the convention center and put a Voice-over-IP phone on a table. I called Ian, clicked on the speaker-phone, and held my recorder next to the speaker.<br />
I record phone interviews all the time for work, but have resisted using a VoIP phone because I don&#8217;t like the sound quality. I&#8217;m not thrilled with this recording, but it&#8217;s a vast improvement over the first take, and I&#8217;m very gratified that Cher and Inigo both enjoyed the quality. I suppose it&#8217;s a great reminder that we&#8217;re not always the best judge of our own work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
